Skip to main content
iamsitting

How I bit the bullet on migrating to HTMX

Let me tell you a story about poor design choice and how a small library saved a project.

In the beginnning... #

There was a project that had gotten old, the VM could not be upgraded, and the project needed to be rewritten from scratch.

So I had a lot of spare time and joined in on this effort having already done a rewrite in Python. I had gained a good amount of experience and had a solid understanding of basic web and http architecture along with Linux and NGINX configuration. However, because of business requirements I had to work in the Microsoft ecosystem. It was 2019 and luckily for me, .NET Core was just coming out.

I was excited to learn a new language and a new framework and to have full control in the design and architecture of this application. In my previous Python rewrite, we were using Django, React, Bootstrap 3, and jQuery. It was an utter mess. Django was great, but React was traumatizing. That said, the best part of the application was the one page that used React.

The Mistake #

In an attempt to not repeat this mistake, I decided I would limit the amount of MVC architecture and go full blow JSON API + SPA architecture. I did this for a couple of reasons:

  1. Decoupling: I wanted everything to be decoupled. The database from the backend API. The backend API from the SPA. My hope was that it would be easier to grow the team if we could find specialist: e.g. a frontend developer vs a backend developer.
  2. Testing: Because of the decoupled architecture, my thought was that it would also be easier to run automated tests at each layer of the application.
  3. Javascript: I figured more people know javascript than C#, so we're more likely to find javascript developers than C# developers. I chose Vue as our framework since it seemed the easiest to learn.

And here were my mistakes:

  1. Thinking an SPA is decoupled. It's not. An SPA may be an application level decoupling, but it's not architecturally. The client must know about the API. So the code is decoupled, but not the architecture. This meant that every time we changed our models or an API, we had to test both the API and the client.
  2. Thinking testing is easy. It's not. Writing test cases is hard, but maintaining them is even harder, especially as requirements change. Lastly, we didn't have the team to support a test infrastructure.
  3. Thinking an SPA framework is just javascript. This is also not true. Knowing an SPA framework requires and understanding of HTTP architecture, state management, templating, routing, etc. The javascript (or typescript in our case) was easy, but the framework was difficult to pick up. And this was the nail in the coffin. As the project grew, the client application became unmanageable.

The Solution #

The solution was switching to a Hypermedia Driven Application. I had heard about HTMX and read several of the essays. As I read through the essays, it felt like the author(s) were writing about my experience.

I tried out HTMX in a few small applications and saw the appeal. But if I was going to invest time and effort into migrating my code base from a thick client to a think client, I wanted to know what I was getting myself into.

So I read the book Hypermedia Systems, and was completely sold on this idea. I started by migrating parts of my codebase. I had a Vertical Slice Architecture that allowed me to migrate part of my application to HTMX while not interfering with the other features.

Some of the improvements I have seen are: